Gender differences in moral judgements linked to emotion

You can see more funny stuff like this over at SMBC
If a time machine was available, would it be right to kill Adolf Hitler when he was still a young Austrian artist to prevent World War II and save millions of lives? Should a police officer torture an alleged bomber to find hidden explosives that could kill many people at a local cafe? When faced with such dilemmas, men are typically more willing to accept harmful actions for the sake of the greater good than women. For example, women would be less likely to support the killing of a young Hitler or torturing a bombing suspect, even if doing so would ultimately save more lives.
What happens in the lab doesn't have to stay in the lab!
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- More
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
April 5, 2015 | Categories: Ethics, Psychology | Tags: behavior, behavioral science, demography, Gender, peer reviewed, personality, science, sex-linked condtioning, social science, socioeconomics | 6 Comments
